Vicki Hinze on Writing

WARNING:  This is a no-edit zone…

 

As writers, we’re asked many questions.  Some from and of ourselves, many more from others.  One question seems perpetual for the frequency with which it’s asked: “In light of how hard it is to get or stay published, why do writers write?”

 

While I can’t answer for everyone, I can share my own thoughts and what I’ve observed from a large pool of writers over a long period of time.

 

Some speculate that it’s the freedom writing affords.  You set your own schedule, work when and as you please, and answer only to yourself.

 

Well, bluntly put and in practical terms, all that’s a myth.  Before writing full-time I was a director of operations for a corporate chain and I had three kids at home (participating in all the typical sports and other activities).  Back then I had at least double the free time that I do now.  

 

Yes, writers set their own schedules.  But those schedules include many activities that are writing related but not actually writing, and they all must be done, too, which knocks out working when and as you please.  Sure, you can choose to write in the mornings and do ancillary related jobs in the afternoon, but typically you end up working most if not all your waking hours less and except those you insist on just taking off to do other things.  When you do that, you do it knowing you’re leaving work undone.

 

As for answering to no one but yourself, well, that’s pretty much a myth, too, though you do ultimately choose how to spend your day.  But you answer to your responsibilities and obligations like most other people in their chosen careers, and you’re not an island.  You work with an editor (or several editors), an agent (or several agents), with marketing and sales and publicity, booksellers, other writers, organizations . . . well, you get the point.  Others are definitely involved, and if you fail to perform, you’ve messed up for yourself and for them.  So it’s not as simple as answering to no one other than yourself.  Ultimately, you answer to your readers.  This is typically a pleasant perk, but pleasant perks too require time and commitment.

 

So I can’t say I know any writers who write for freedom it affords them.  Far more often writers are reduced to sandwiching in time to actually write.

 

Some speculate that an inborn talent drives the writer to continue writing when not writing would be easier.

 

I respectfully disagree.  I know many talented writers who never wrote to sell a book, have never submitted a book to a publisher, or who have stopped writing because selling books for a living was too difficult or unstable and/or problematic. 

 

And let’s be frank.  Writing is never and will never be easy.  It’s only through a writer’s effort (some say blood and sweat) that it appears easy.

 

But talent is only one of many criteria when it comes to selling what you write.  It’s nothing to sneeze at, so don’t get me wrong, but talent alone will not give the writer the discipline or ability to write a book or the fortitude to sell one, much less to write and sell the body of work one produces over the span of a career as a writer.

 

True, one can learn almost everything to do with writing as a career.  One can learn craft, how the industry works.  One can learn to network and market, to integrate into the business.  One can learn everything except one thing:  storytelling.  That is a gift–a talent–one has or one does not.  Yet merely having the talent doesn’t ensure one’s ability to use it to successfully parlay it into a writing career.  So talent doesn’t keep a writer writing…

 

Some speculate that perseverance keeps a writer writing.  

 

Not exactly.  Persistence and perseverance keeps a writer who wants to write writing in the face of rejections and other challenges encouraging the writer to stop writing, but perseverance alone isn’t enough to get a writer to write when that writer isn’t already determined to do so.

 

It’s like with thirst.  If you’re thirsty you drink.  If you’re really thirsty, you’ll crawl across a desert looking for that oasis and you’ll keep crawling until you find water because you’re thirsty.  You’ll persevere.  But perseverance didn’t create the thirst.  It’s a reaction to the struggle to find water.

 

For the writer who struggles to get the writing published, perseverance is a tool that aids in the struggle-phase, but it comes after the writing.   Now for the writer who elects to write but finds enthusiasm waning to stick with the writing until the work is done . . . perseverance definitely comes into play, as does discipline.  But either alone or combined, they are not the catalysts for writing.  They’re the reaction to the catalyst–like with thirst.  So, no, perseverance can’t make a writer write.

 

Some speculate education keeps a writer writing.

 

While I’m a huge proponent of education and see benefits in it in all we do or attempt to do, education alone doesn’t make a writer write.  It can deepen the creative well from which a writer can draw.  It can enable a writer to convey a story clearly, efficiently.  It can help stage an environment wherein a writer can emote, tell a story in a way that makes it appeal to readers (the first of whom are an agent or an editor) but education alone isn’t going to put or keep a writer’s backside in a chair and keep it there through the creative process of creating a book.

 

Some speculate it’s the relationships a writer forms with other writers, agents and/or editors, bonds with readers that makes a writer keep writing.

 

Those relationships are important.  Critical–to the writer and his/her family, who are spared writing talk only because those other relationships exist.  No one “gets” writers like other writers.  No one understands the nuances of the process like those in the business.  And no one understands the elations and the challenges inbred like those in it.  But those are perks that could be applied to any career-field.  Scientists about science.  CPAs about numbers and tax law.  Mechanics about auto repairs.  Definitely desirable, definitely beneficial, but relationships do not create and maintain the desire to write.  They may support it after it already exists, but these things do not forge the desire. 

 

Some speculate the story itself keeps the discouraged, despairing writer writing.

 

This is closer to the truth, but not all of it.  Enthusiasm for a story, excitement about it, runs in phases.  The initial burst of enthusiasm.  The wall where enthusiasm fizzles and writing turns to work.  The temptation to cease and desist wars with the determination to finish.

 

There could be, and typically are, other phases, too.  The really good ones run their course in about the first three chapters of the book.  Then the good stuff goes dormant until the writer is almost at the end.  This is why you read so much on sagging middles.  And why middles are predisposed to sagging.  The enthusiasm isn’t as strong to shore them up.  That means more work for the writer, trying to fire it up to shore up the middle.

 

If the writer isn’t wholly engaged with the story, you can see how much more difficult the process would be.  It’s plenty difficult when wholly engaged.  It’s under those circumstances that burst of excitement fires and sustains you for those three chapters.  After that, you’ve got to create and generate excitement.  Find something in the work that fires you up to keep going.

 

So, no, the story alone isn’t enough to keep the writer writing.  It’s significant and its impact is undeniably a factor, but story alone won’t keep a writer writing–not for a book, not for the span of a career.

 

Some speculate that the writer feels “too invested” in writing to start over doing something else and that’s why s/he sticks with it.

 

With changing markets, I expect many writers go through periods of time feeling this way, but I can’t say I know any who have elected to write or to continue to write because they felt they had too much invested to do anything else.

 

By nature, writers are interested in many things.  Diversity is one of their assets, and that makes them marketable in the work force.  Rather than too invested invested to do anything else, I’d say they’re innately capable of doing many other things–many of which make earning a living far easier in other positions than in that of a career writer.

 

Starting over might not be fun or an appealing thing, but considering most writers reinvent themselves an average of three times in their writing career, I’d say that makes this speculation a myth, too.  The average writer already starts anew–some far more than three times–so I don’t see how this could keep a writer writing.

 

Some speculate it’s the money, fame and prestige that keeps a writer writing.

 

Sorry, but this doesn’t begin to wash.  Most writers don’t make a decent living much less a fortune.  Many go their entire careers writing consistently but are never recognized for it.  That pretty well does away with delusions of grandeur on the fame and prestige fronts.

 

So why then do writers do what they do?  Even when they’re hearing no far more often than yes, why do they keep writing?

 

Here’s where we’re back from observation to what I know from personal experience.

 

I know writers write because they have something to say that they want others to hear.

 

I know writers write because they have a reason to write–they feel a strong purpose to their work.  That purpose, whatever it might be, ignites the desire to write in them and fans the flame so that it burns consistently and without fail.

 

I know writers write because the idea of not writing is more than they can bear.  A life without writing to convey the stories in their heads is the shell of a life but not one fully lived.  Not for a writer.

 

Purpose ignites and fires the desire.  Desire fuels all the rest.  Sustains the writer, infuses the writer with the will and discipline and perseverance and determination to do and learn all that’s required.  Purpose and that infused need to relate keeps the writer writing.  Even when it’s tough to sell.  Even when it’s tough to keep backside to chair day in and out, month after month, year after year.

 

A writer is inspired.  Alone that can’t get or keep a writer writing.  But infuse that inspiration with purpose, and that will start a chain reaction in the writer.  

 

Inspiration.  Infused with purpose.  Sparks desire.  A need to relate.

 

But wait.  Not just anything inspires a writer and motivates him/her to actually write.  Different things impact people differently, right?  So what differentiates the writing kind of inspiration from your average run-of-the-mill inspiration?  What in inspiration gets a writer writing or keeps one writing?

 

Purpose. It defines what sparks our specific imagination.  Purpose infuses imagination and defines something as the type of inspiration that makes a writer write.  Purpose infused imagination sparks desire, that need to relate, and fans its flames, and keeps the writer writing well beyond the time when logic and reason and sense say to quit.  Even when everything says stop now… one thing strongly disagrees and it then keeps writers writing.  The heart.

 

The heart pays more attention to purpose than does the mind, reason or logic.  The heart is attuned to the desires in it.  It’s the well from which purpose-driven imagination springs.  And it refuses to be silenced.  To have inner peace with him/herself, the writer keeps writing.

 

And there’s my version of the straight skinny on this matter.  

 

So the next time someone asks what keeps a writer writing when everything–and often, everyone–says stop, you might respond with the short version:

 

Purpose.

 

It really is just that simple–and complex.

 

Blessings,

 

Vicki

 

©2008, Vicki Hinze

 

Tags:  author, writer, novelist, creative writing, purpose, writing, rationale, desire, imagination, value, determination, drive, will,  persistence, perseverance, fortitude, ambition

©2008, Vicki Hinze

WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME…?

WARNING:  This is a no-edit zone…

Yesterday, a writer came to me deflated, disillusioned and all but devastated.  Her work had been ripped to shreds by a group of fellow writers–one who had by their own choice elected to work as a group to strengthen and assist every other writer in that group.

I’m not going to judge their actions.  I’m going to believe that their intentions were good and that their hearts were in the right place.  I’m going to believe that there wasn’t a smidgen of jealousy, envy or a nasty thought anywhere in the bunch.  Admittedly, I’m having to work to believe these things, but I choose to believe them, because the thought of a writer–any writer–deliberately doing harm to another, knowing what it takes… well, it’s just not acceptable to dwell on that.

You see, this writer has worked hard but she’s also been fortunate and landed herself a very nice publishing contract.  And some others who have worked hard have not enjoyed that bit of luck.  But that aside, they know this writer, Lucky, has worked hard and suffered through trials and triumphs and gains and setbacks.  She took a risk and made her luck, and she got it.

Now suddenly everything she writes is incurably flawed.  Whether the others were tearing down her work to build themselves up, I don’t know.  Whether they realize that while they copious remarks on what was wrong, not one bothered to mention anything–not one thing–that is right.  A lot is right.

Lucky and I had a long chat about this situation, and while I refused to advise her on staying with her group or departing–that is a decision that is solely hers to make–it does raise this opportunity to talk with writers about how they treat other writers.

First, no one insists that you join a group.  No one insists that you read anyone else’s work.  And no one insists that you comment on someone else’s work.

You join a group by choice.  You elect to give your best for the others’ good and you accept their best for your own.  It’s a strategic business alliance for mutual benefit.

So if you can’t share in the joys and triumphs that result from the collective effort, why are you there?  That is the objective:  to assist and be assisted in creating the best work possible.

I’ve often said that writers should write with passion and compassion.  Passion for what you’re writing, and compassion for the people–in the novel, and those who will read it.

It went without saying that in a group created to assist and be assisted, one should read with passion and compassion, too.

Telling a writer what is wrong is valuable.  It’s important.  And it’s a core element of why the group formed and everyone is investing in the work being done.  But telling a writer what is right is equally valuable if not more so.  Because it is on what is right that we build.

We take the good and make it stronger and better.  We expand it.  While we attempt to take what is wrong and make it right.  Bad to good.  Minimize the bad.  Expand the good.

Well, if you read someone else’s work and you fail to mention the good, then what have you done for them?  Upon what do they build?  What strengths have you pointed out for them upon which they can expand?

Every writer has strengths and weaknesses.  When you read for another, it’s your responsibility to be honest.  Honest means honest.  It doesn’t mean bringing your own trials, tribulations and/or baggage to the table.  You have an obligation–one of your own choosing–to be as objective as humanly possible and to give the work your best.  That means identifying weaknesses (with passion AND compassion) and strengths (again, with passion and compassion).

Every writer knows the struggle to tell a story just so.  The battle to get the right words in the right place at the right time to convey the right emotions for the right reasons to effect the right outcome.  We know that it is a writer’s sweat and hair-pulling and sometimes even tears that makes writing look easy and simple.  We know that it is anything but simple.  We know what it takes because we too make that investment.

And all this leads me to ask a question today because this situation is weighing very heavily on my mind this morning.   When was the last time?

The last time you asked someone else how can I help you?

The last time you read and pointed out what’s right as well as what’s wrong?

The last time you celebrated someone else’s victory with genuine enthusiasm?

The last time you looked beyond you, deliberately left you out of a situation with the express intention of lifting up someone else?

Write and read with passion and compassion.

Be honest.  Absolutely.  With others, and also with yourself.

Understand that if you’re not a positive influence in someone else’s life, you’re a negative influence.  That too raises a question we should answer:  “Which do I want to be?”

We all know which is destructive and which is constructive.  Destroying another in no way elevates us.  So if we can’t remove the “me” from our reading for others, then we should recognize it and not read for others.   And if that is the situation, then we should then not expect others to read for us.  We best serve all by removing ourselves.  True, we will lose good, but we also will do no harm.

Perhaps such a drastic measure isn’t necessary.  Perhaps we hadn’t considered or thought of what we were doing as damaging.  Perhaps now, we will.

And perhaps we can start by asking ourselves, when was the last time…?

Blessings,

Vicki

Tags:

 

 

WARNING:  This is a no-edit zone…

I love and collect quotes. I came across one a couple days ago that totally speaks to the writer in me:

“In every work of genius, we recognize our own rejected thoughts; 

they come back to us with a certain alienated majesty.”            

—Ralph Waldo Emerson

I read Mr. Emerson’s words and thought, “Perfect. Exactly the right goal and aspiration and tone for a writer who writes first with purpose.”

And that made me wonder. How many writers actually identify their goal for their writing? Not what or how much or when they write, but what they hope the work will achieve? What message it will convey to readers? How many writers have defined that message? How many have a clear sense of self and the role it plays in their work?

Is this something that most writers think about? Or do they drift story to story, writing the books they choose for a purpose defined only by that work and not by their entire body of work? I’ve pondered on this quite a bit lately–sitting with one’s eyes closed can assist one in seeing the less-than-obvious quite clearly–and I know writers who do both. Or ones who flip from one position–by the book–to the other–by the body of work. And that got me to thinking about Author Theme.

If we examine an author’s body of work, we do see a recurring theme in all of the books. It doesn’t matter what genre they’re written in, what classification tags have been assigned to them; plot and tone and characters can vary widely, but the underlying author’s theme remains intact.

It is the reflection of the author herself. Her perspective, ideas, attitudes and dreams. Readers see and believe and are led to accept what the author wants us to see and believe and accept. We react to the assets the writer employs. That theme might be healing or redemption or cowardice. It might be independence or protection or betrayal. Loyalty, abuse, or dealing with issues such as illness. It might be inspiring, encouraging, offering hope.  Regardless, every author has a theme.

Writers often say, I want to make the bestseller list. I want to be published in hard cover. I want to be sent on tour. I want larger print runs, more money, broader audiences. All of that is fine–and business aspects should be addressed by those writers who write to sell. But can writers write-to-sell and have a defined goal for their body of work? Do they? That’s the question of interest to me.

When I first started writing, I set a standard for myself on the books I write. I must love them. That’s shorthand, of course, and I know what it takes for me to love a book enough to be willing to invest a share of my life into writing it. For me, that love includes purpose. Every book I write, every story I plot, has a purpose that resonates with me and that I hope will resonate with readers. So that they will see something just a little differently after reading the book than they did before reading it. Something that turns on a light, broadens a perspective, shows that unknown options exist and anyone can utilize them if they choose to do so and act on the choice.

So writing with purpose isn’t a new concept to me. But those goals have defined the purpose for writing a specific book–each specific book. I’ve never before considered them in relation to the body of work I’m creating.

My body of work has not had a defined purpose. It has not had a single goal that can be attributed to all of the books except in the broadest of terms. I’ve been remiss!!!

So begins my exploration for that specific body-of-work purpose–and Mr. Emerson’s quote, for me, defines it perfectly. I have a starting point,

I am a genius. Not bragging or complaining, just stating a fact with no more or less importance placed on it than on the fact that I am a woman. I had nothing to do with either designation or attribute; the characteristics were divined, like having blonde hair, blue eyes and a crooked nose. But recognition of the human condition? That, I–we all–can choose to do. To notice, acknowledge and either accept or reject. And I can choose the value I place on that recognition. Every human being can. Every writer can.

And that’s now the mission. To clearly define my goal for the body of work I’m creating, recognizing the human condition and the value in it.

Mr. Emerson’s insight humbles me. How brilliant he was to recognize and verbalize the importance of this. At times, our own rejected thoughts do come back to us both alien and majestic.

And at times, from a mere few words strung together with purpose by someone who has pondered life and humanity and the human heart, we glimpse the mysteries and discover that which we had failed to notice or recognize. We become aware of what we had neglected.

That awareness is a valuable gift. In it is an opportunity to change that circumstance. A chance to redefine our purpose, to hone it so that it becomes clearer to us in our vision of what we want to do with our lives.

Writing requires physical work, yes. But it carries equal demands on our emotions–the method through which we connect with readers–and spiritually–our shared perspectives, attitudes, fears and ideas, beliefs and hopes and dreams. We relay our experiences, define the world and people around us. We attribute qualities that appeal and repulse us. Through our stories and the characters in them, we live.

And life, being precious and elusive and ours for only a short time, should be lived with intention. The clearer our vision of what we hope to accomplish through our writing, the more successful we are at defining and fulfilling intent.

I’m reminded of something I once heard about the end of life. I can’t quote it directly; it’s been a long time since I heard it. But it was about not reaching the end of life neat and tidy. It was about skidding in sideways, exhausted and used up, thinking, “What a ride!”

Used up, as in replete, content and satisfied that you’d explored all that most mattered to you. Without regret that you’d always played by the rules and always ended up on the short end of the stick without much satisfaction to show for a tremendous amount of effort.

All mortal life ends. It’s how it’s lived that matters. I kind of like that skidding in sideways visual image–so I’m going to keep it, and Mr. Emerson’s insight, in mind and further define my body-of-work goals.

Hmm. Two lines of text and it’s been on my mind for three days. I’ve read hundred thousand word books that didn’t linger three hours. Haven’t you? 

Imagine… To have that kind of residual effect, to have someone read your book and then ponder on it as it relates to their own life… Now that’s a goal for a body of work, isn’t it?

And that’s what’s on my mind this morning… Well, one of two things. The other is wondering why this emerald ring that popped up unexpectedly in the writing is so determined to be significant.  I have no idea why, or to whom–yet.*

Blessings,

Vicki

C2008,VICKI HINZE

©2008, Vicki Hinze

 

 

WARNING:  This is a no-edit zone…

 

Regardless of career field, at some point and time, most people are confronted with the need to reinvent themselves.  The reasons that prompt the reinvention are as varied as we are.

 

WHY REINVENT?

 

It may be a personal choice.  The career path you’d been on, just doesn’t fit you anymore.  Personal tragedies, events that have a profound impact on you, maturity and/or personal growth can ignite the desire to reinvent.  We change.  What we want to do with our lives change.  If the change is significant, and important enough to us, we reinvent, knowing we’ll be starting over and working our way up the proverbial ladder–again.  

 

Writers often reinvent themselves–some, many times during the course of a career.  Lines/imprints come and go, demand rises and falls, risky books fail, some elect to ghost write for others and avoid all the ancillary work a writer’s called on to do.  There are a thousand reasons–and all of them start with something changing.  The writer, the market, sales performance, passion for what one is doing…

 

It may be as a result of changing times.  New technology and applications has had a profound impact on people needing to reinvent to stay employed, for what they’re doing professionally to stay relevant.  I’m not talking so much about trends but about advances that redefine industries and the work done in them. 

 

I’m recalling the time when personal computers first began to appear in small businesses and a then employee told her boss that she had kept books fine without a computer for years and would continue to do so.  He encouraged her to take the training the company was offering, but she refused.  Not too long afterward, she ended up between the rock and hard place.  Her work–the means by which she did it–had become obsolete, and since she refused to embrace the new way of doing things, she had become obsolete.  She ended up unemployed because she refused to reinvent herself.

 

Most degrees are obsolete within five years of getting them.  Most people realize that they can’t rely on what they know now to carry them through a long-term future.  They must continue to grow and expand their skills.  Some, like the woman above, elected not to do so.  Her choice, and the outcome of it is also her responsibility.  The moral of that story is, of course, to keep learning and growing–and, probably most importantly, to keep an open mind.

 

COMMON REINVENTION MISTAKES

 

Chasing Trends.  One of the most common mistakes made in reinvention is that the person chases a perceived trend.  The challenge of course is that by the time the trend is identified, it’s often saturated or out of vogue.  Unfortunately, this happened with many writers a few years ago when suspense became so popular.  Suddenly people who had no interest in suspense (and were gifted in other forms of writing) switched to writing suspense because of its popularity.  A similar event occurred in “chick-lit” after Bridget Jones:  a decision that has since had many of those same authors reinventing themselves and their careers yet again.

 

Ignoring strengths.  All too often, a writer will read a book, or several books, that are outside the normal sphere, enjoy them and decide to write one.  S/he does, enjoys it, and then writes another.  But along about book three, the writer isn’t enjoying the new type of book anymore and interest has waned in writing them.  

 

Maybe the new type of book doesn’t play to the writer’s strengths.  Maybe it doesn’t challenge her, or the practical subjects for the novels bore her to tears.  No one in this position does their best work, and because the writer ignored her strengths in making this “leap” to a new kind of book, now she has to suck it up and produce anyway (a great way to kill creativity and produce substandard work), or reinvent again.  Which is one way of saying, Writer, know thyself before you leap.  

 

That leads to the biggest, worst reinvention mistake we make:

 

Uniformed decisions.  Far too often the writer will choose a different genre or type of work because things aren’t great in the work s/he’s doing.  Because someone else is encouraging her to change what s/he’s doing.  Because s/he’s done what s/he’s doing for a long time and s/he creatively yearns for an enthusiasm infusion that comes with tackling something new and different.  But rather than approach the possibility of reinvention analytically, taking into account the writer (human being and artist) and the market potential, the writer just jumps.

 

Too often, the writer reinvents with too little thought given to the human being in the writer.  It’s all about career potential, sales.  Those things are important, yes, but so is the human being in the writer.  If there is no contentment, excitement–no passion–for what you will be doing, then the specific reinvention choice isn’t the right one.  Keep looking.

 

Any reinvention worth doing is worth the analysis required to do it well.  Only by doing the work can you have any assurance that you are making the right choice for the right reason.  Remember, you aren’t reinventing your career to become someone else.  (That’s true even if your covers cite another name!)  You’re reinventing yourself to reveal a new aspect of you. 

 

You are at the center of your work.  And you should be at the core of your reinvention.  Regardless of why you are reinventing, whatever you morph to should be an outgrowth of who you’ve become, are becoming, or want to become.  

 

That is the single most thing that writers tend to miss in transforming.  And the single most thing that others miss in revamping their career strategies.  

 

Change often stems from necessity.  Sometimes it stems from desire.  In analyzing your specific case, understanding why you’re reinventing, planning a solid strategy for doing it that incorporates you (your strengths, goals, dreams and desires), increases your odds of a successful reinvention.

 

A tip from the trench:  Follow your bliss.  

 

I did a post on this not too very long ago, so I won’t bore you with repeating it, but if your passion is engaged, little can hold you back or down or dissuade you. 

 

Don’t consider any reinvention that doesn’t ignite a fire in you that burns so hot you think you’ll melt from the inside out.  That will sustain you through the transformation, through the onslaught of those asking if you’ve lost your mind for getting off a successful track to get on an unknown one, through the challenges of starting over and working your way up the ranks again–or again after having done it before (maybe several times). 

 

Embrace the passion and follow your bliss.  

 

When you reinvent yourself embracing the passion and following your bliss, you’re nearly there on fulfillment and contentment.  Imagine…  Being nearly there coming out of the gate.

 

None of us had that much going for us in our first professional invention, did we?

 

Blessings,

 

Vicki

 

Tags:  reinventing, career, strategy, goals, dreams, desire, bliss, passion, authors, writing, writers, novelists, books, contentment, fulfillment, career analysis, trends, relevance

 

 

 

 

 

WARNING:  This is a no-edit zone…

 

Since I’ve received so many notes asking about the changes on the site, I thought I’d answer here.

 

In short, someone has too much time on their hands and not enough substance to use it constructively, so they’ve been clipping my articles, attaching them and my name to spam, largely on sites dedicated to mature content.  (Read between the lines and you’ll get the malicious gist of it.)

 

Not only is this copyright infringement, it’s a greater offense because I have a lot of minor students who use the writers’ library because they’re interested in learning to write or in becoming writers.  If one uses a search engine rather than coming directly to this site, one is apt to see photos and read content one shouldn’t–and doesn’t want to–read.  

 

So I filed reports with the FBI and they’ve been terrific.  All of this has sidetracked me from my own work, trying to undo the nastiness. I’ve lost mental track of the number of abuse reports filed, the number of notices of copyright violations, etc. (Yes, I did retain hard copies, electronic copies and backups.  I’ve nearly filled a flash drive with this nonsense.)  Authorities and an electronic investigator have been hard at work running all this down to nip this challenge in the bud.

 

A head’s up warning:  do check your yahoo groups.  I discovered my public email address had been subscribed to lists I hadn’t or wouldn’t join.  I had no idea.  (Lesson learned:  monitor all.)

 

Anyway, with all of this going on, I had to do something to a) protect the young adults from exposure as best I am able and b) protect my copyrights.  So I moved the Writers’ Library to a private access site.  It requires an ID and password (more work on this end), is monitored (even more work on this end) and is computer specific (yet even more work on this end).

 

There were two choices:  stop sharing or go private access.  I elected to go private access.  I don’t like it, library users (I’m sure) don’t like it (though they’ve expressed understanding and support, for which I’m grateful).  But one of my missions in life is to mentor and so it’s an extra effort I wish I didn’t have to take, but I will take to not be derailed from my mission.

 

Initially, I was advised to put my Faith Zone blog posts on the private access site as well as the Writers’ Library.  Actually, I was advised to put the instructional blog posts written here in My Kitchen Table, the Faith Zone posts, my podcasts and the Writers’ Library on the private access site.

 

I did move the Faith Zone and Writers’ Library.  But the Faith Zone being behind closed doors really rubbed me raw.  I write it to share my spiritual journey so others can see we all stumble and fumble and fall to our knees, scrape our noses and still get up and move forward again.  That’s the entire purpose of sharing it.  If it’s locked behind closed doors, so to speak, then it can’t fulfill its purpose for existing.

 

So again I was at a crossroad and it was decision time.  Do I allow someone with poor judgment (committing destructive acts just to annoy or damage rather than focusing on their own personal, constructive forward momentum IS poor judgment) to interfere?  Or do I elect to drop the project?

 

Dropping it would have been easier.  Much easier than this negative time-eater (for me and others!).  But, you know, that’s a cut-and-run resolution to this challenge, and that’s no solution at all.

 

So I prayed a lot, moved many of the Faith Zone posts back into the open forum, and have some monitoring assistance that is exceptional at doing what they do.  And I recall something my dad once said and I’ve not forgotten:  “If it’s worth doing, it’s worth fighting for.  If it’s not worth fighting for, why are you doing it?”

 

Faith Zone is worth doing.  

Going through the private access site challenges is worth doing.

Nipping copyright infringements and adopting a zero-tolerance policy on them is worth doing.

The added demands on my time and resources to mentor with the library are worth doing.

 

Bottom line, I’m doing what I believe has worth.

 

So that’s what’s going on.  It’s why my posting has been sporadic.  It’s why things are shuffling around and processes and permissions are changing.   It’s why I’m taking a bit longer to respond to emails and why I’ve recruited a little extra help.  I nicknamed her “The Enforcer” and him “The Hammer.” ☺  

 

If you happen across a violation, please let me know.  If we allow this nonsense, we’re doomed to more of it.  Getting away with it only encourages more of it and for others prone to this type of thing to violate us, too.  I don’t like feeling violated, and I’m sure you don’t, either.  So it’s on to pro-active time.

 

Here’s a quick list on what’s where now:

 

My Kitchen Table blog is public and HERE on the writing website. (www.vickihinze.com)

Faith Zone blog is public and HERE on the writing website.  (www.vickihinze.com)

Kids’ Faith Zone blog is public and at www.faithzonegran.com.  (Audio has been added.)

Writers’ Library is on a private access site.  Apply for access HERE.

Newsletters are public and HERE on the writing website. (www.vickihinze.com)

Readers’ Discussion Guides for readers’ groups are on the individual Book Pages.

Podcasts are public and HERE on the writing website. (www.vickihinze.com)

 

Everything else remains the same.

 

One note:  There are still a few posts in the Private Access Site FAITH ZONE blog that have not been migrated back to the public site.

 

So that’s what’s been going on here.  It hasn’t been fun, but it certainly has been informative.  Soon, I’ll post a Tip Sheet on things you might want to check to make sure none of the nonsense is going on with you–and if it is, what countermeasures you can take.

 

It’s worth it.  You’re worth it.

 

Blessings,

 

Vicki

 

 

 

(C) 2008, VICKI HINZE

WARNING:  This is a no-edit zone…

 

It’s contest time.  Writers from all over the world are entering contests and other writers (and editors and agents) from all over the world are judging and/or critiquing them.

 

I’m critiquing and judging (two separate contests) and coordinating a third.  Why?  Because I love seeing what’s there.  What people are thinking, the kinds of things that fascinate them enough to tackle a book, the way they use their words and structure a story.  In short, it’s fun.

 

Yesterday, a good friend and I touched base.  She too is judging/critiquing right now.  And while we, of course, didn’t discuss specific entries, we did both note a trend to heavy narrative in the works.  And we both wondered why.  Neither of us had an answer, so I phoned a third friend, who also does a lot of judging/critiquing.  She, too, had picked up on this trend.

 

We put our heads together and determined  . . . READ MORE…

 

Effective today, I will be posting my blogs on my website.

My Kitchen Table

      Writing:  art, craft, business and life.  (Also permits access to the Writer’s Library.)

 

Faith Zone

     Spirituality

 

The “Vicki Hinze on Writing” blog articles will be incorporated into the MY KITCHEN TABLE blog.

The website url, should you have link challenges or desire to paste into your browser is: http://www.vickihinze.com

Blessings,

Vicki

P.S. If you’re viewing this via reader, you’ll need to visit the www.vickihinze.com website to view any updates. I apologize for any inconvenience, but I’m paddling as hard as I can, and I just can’t keep up, so I’m having to consolidate where and when possible. Appreciate your understanding. Vicki Hinze www.vickihinze.com  

WARNING:  This is a no-edit zone…

 

Writing is an art.

The artist creates a world, peoples it, and draws readers into that world through the senses so that they might experience the story.

Writers write for as many different reasons as there are types of writing.  Each brings to the artist’s palette his or her universal qualities (human beings, those things most of us consider good and valuable and bad and destructive) and his or her own unique qualities (his or her unique perspective, collective experiences, insights and attitudes, hopes and dreams, likes and dislikes–all the things that are specific to that one writer).

These assets are reflected in the writer’s voice.  And that is the heart of that individual’s art.  It can’t be replicated or duplicated or copied in whole by any other artist.  Another might attempt it, might copy the artist’s style but it can’t be maintained through the novel because no two people will make the exact same choices each and every time a choice is required or made during the course of creating a book.

Remember that when a writer writes, s/he is creating something from nothing.  Everything, even those wherein the writer is basing the novel on actual events, is created.  What I mean by that is the author chooses what to write–the events, the people, the conflicts, the results, where events occur, who is present and why they are present.  The writer chooses what details to reflect, and cues the reader on what those details mean–to the person perceiving them.  To the persons present, informed of them, impacted by them.

The writer manipulates the emotions of the characters and readers’ reactions through choices.  The tone of the scene, the events occurring in them, the reactions infused into the other characters.  It is the writer’s depiction that makes the rest of us fall in love, fear, doubt, feel humbled and/or awed.  It’s the art.

Whether you’re writing literary or commercial fiction, all of the above holds true.  We write because we have something to say that we want others to hear.  The format in which we do so is also a choice.  And regardless of which choice we make, the very moment we choose to sell what we write, we take on a whole new set of choices.  Those have to do with things like reader appeal and marketability.

Some refuse to include those considerations in the crafting of the novel.  Some have learned that including those considerations and crafting the novel around specific marketing expectations greatly enhances their ability to sell the novel once it’s written.

It’s a personal choice for each writer.  How much emphasis is placed on the purity of the art and on the purity of marketability of the art.  A healthy balance can be found in respecting both.  Love the book you write, or change it until you do, but also consider the marketability of what you write when you’re constructing and building your novel.

If you’re writing in genre, you should observe the conventions of the genre.  Otherwise, you violate reader expectations.  No artist wants a disappointed reader.  So the balance is to write a story that you love that respects the genre dictates.  Can you stretch the boundaries?  Yes, you can.  Can you try to expand the current genre by introducing a new element?  Of course.  New sub-genres are formed in these ways.  

Note “sub-genres.”  That means the writer followed the genre dictates but added something new.  That something new didn’t toss out the old.  It added to it.  For example, the paranormal romance.  In 1988, I wrote a book that was what today we’d call a paranormal novel, MAYBE THIS TIME.  In attempting to market the book, I spent more time trying to explain what kind of book it was than I spent pitching the story.  Publishers were resistant.  They had to be.  There was no defined marketing niche for a “Romantic Fantasy” which is how I tagged the book.

Publishers love books.  They love to buy books.  But they can only buy books that they can sell.  It’s a significant fact worth remembering.

Anyway, with no defined market, getting someone to read that book was a challenge.  It took several years to sell it.  Editors read it, liked it, tried to get it approved in committee, and failed.  Four years later, one managed.  Two years after that, the book was released and it did well.  And a few years later, my “romantic fantasy” because part of a new sub-genre, the paranormal romance.  

Today that sub-genre is mentally equated to things like vampires and shapeshifters and ghosts and such.  That book contains none of those things.  It’s a reincarnation theme, which just wasn’t heard of at the time.  So not considering the marketability, while elating from an artist’s perspective, wasn’t a brilliant career move from the marketing perspective.  I knew that when I did it, and elected to do it anyway.

And that’s the point of this article.  I made a deliberate choice to upset the balance between art and marketability that I knew carried bottom line consequences.  I gladly paid them because, frankly, I loved the story more than compensation for it in sales.

When you’re deciding what to write and how to write it, how you resolve the balance between art and the bottom line is wholly your call.  There is no wrong or right answer.  The important thing is to understand that there is a balance and to deliberately choose what it will be in your work.  It’s equally important to know that neither art nor marketability is mutually exclusive.  One need not be forfeited for the sake of the other.  They can function together in harmony.  

Remember, you are artists.  And artists are creative.  If a way exists, use it.  If not, create one…

Blessings,

Vicki

©2008, Vicki Hinze

www.vickihinze.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

©2008, Vicki Hinze

Once, I believed that Writer’s Block did not exist. Sincerely, truly, and—I thought—irrevocably. Then, I woke up.

Actually, that wake-up call came in the form of it being pointed out to me that soldiers who go to war (and people who are in accidents) and lose limbs still feel toes or fingers no longer attached to their bodies itch. Amputated knees ache. Missing arms throb. All long after the physical trauma to the body of losing that limb has passed. These sensations are commonly referred to as “Phantom Pains.”

Doesn’t it stand to reason then that if the physical body can suffer phantom pains that the creative body can as well?

Okay, I conceded. I was wrong. If phantom pains can exist in the physical, and there is in fact harmony and balance in all things—as I believe there is—then logically I have to accept that phantom pains can exist in the creative, emotional state.

That concession made, I firmly chose to deliberately convince my logical mind that writer’s block doesn’t exist. Why? A purely selfish reason, I admit. Because thoughts have power. And if I refuse to believe Writer’s Block exists, then I can’t get it.

Sounds goofy, doesn’t it?

Topically, I agree it does. But who cares how it sounds if it works? And this does work. In ten years, I’ve seen excellent writers agonize with Writer’s Block, and yet I’ve miraculously avoided it. That blessing set me to wondering, Why?

I’ve drawn a few conclusions that, I hope, will help you avoid suffering this debilitating, excruciating, and painful plague.

First and most powerful, I think, is recognizing that thoughts have power. If you “think” you’re blocked, “believe” you’re blocked, you will be. The reason isn’t at all mysterious. Our every thought feeds directly into our subconscious as fact. The subconscious can’t interpret; it takes in everything in a literal sense. It doesn’t interpret and it never forgets. The subconscious can’t differentiate between truth and falsehoods or speculations, or fears voiced, either. So if you think you’re blocked, then take it to the bank, because your subconscious mind will convince your conscious mind that you are blocked, and then you will be.

The solution is to “think” yourself into creative freedom. Believe you can write and write and never run out of words. It’s a simple solution, but its power is complex—and effective.

Sometimes writers feel blocked because they have drained their reserves. Remember, your body needs fuel to run. So does your creativity. When you constantly pour out creativity without refueling and taking in things that feed your creativity, you deplete your reserves and you end up with an empty creative well.

When you dip into an empty well, you can’t draw out water. The well is dry. Same holds true for the creative well. But is this writer’s block? Truly?

The effect is the same, but it’s really only a matter of refilling your creative well, of feeding your creative self.
How do you do that? Read. Read novels, nonfiction books on topics that interest you. Magazine articles, newspaper reports. Watch movies. Listen to conversations, take walks and observe nature. Daydream.

Indulge yourself in fantasies. The more you put into your mind—your well—the deeper well you have to draw from.

Ever wonder what it would be like to be a surgeon? Ask one. Observe a surgical procedure. Watch a heart beat, a liver quiver. It’s truly fascinating. Want to be a judge? Sit in on a court hearing. Get your juices flowing by feeding your interests. That fills your creative well.

Sometimes we feel blocked because we don’t have a clear picture of exactly what we want to say. Do you know the theme of your novel? Can you put it down in concrete terms, in a few sentences? If not, think about it until you can. If you don’t know what you want to say, how can you work a story into saying anything in particular? You can’t. You sit and write and take off on tangents and work hard and harder still and end up with a lot of material that’s not a cohesive whole.

Interpretation? Writer’s Block. But is it?

Not really, though the result is the same. It’s a lack of specific focus, of direction.

Other times, we tumble to a stop because we don’t really understand our characters. We haven’t fully explored these people and so we don’t have a firm grasp on what makes them tick. What do they love, hate, admire, and respect? What do they fear? How are they going to grow and change during the course of the novel? Motivation. Conflict—internal and external—is essential, but so is knowing what makes each character universal and unique.

If you don’t know your characters as well or better than you know yourself, how can you write how they’ll react to a given novel situation? You can’t. And so you stumble to that stop without a clue as to how to proceed. And that is often interpreted as writer’s block.

The solution to work past it: interview these people. Author, Kim Kozlowski, crafted a wonderful character interview that is indispensable. It takes time to complete, because it’s very thorough, and you won’t use all the information you glean in preparing it. But you will know these characters, and you will know what they wouldn’t or wouldn’t do in any given situation. And in interviewing them, they will spur the plot—one that is custom-made to highlight their goals, motivations, and conflicts, and enhance their novel purpose. Result: no more writer’s block.

The same situation with character holds true for plot. Without a clear path on where you’re going in the novel–and what story events you intend to incorporate to take you there, you can write yourself into countless corners, brick walls, dead-ends with no logical way out. And while this too is often interpreted as WB, it isn’t. Not really. It’s a lack of planning. Of knowing how you intend to get from Point A to B. One way to eliminate this situation is to use a plot board.

Do a synopsis, lay out your chapters and scenes. Then check that plot board for all manner of things.

Character growth and development, conflict, motivation, logical succession of events. You can check for logic gaps, natural progression, character consistency. You can check your time line—make sure things are happening in the right order, sequentially. Check your settings to make sure each is compatible with the mood and tone of the scene. You can check essentially all elements of the novel on this board.

In addition to realizing that thoughts hold an enormous amount of power, that creativity must be nurtured and that well refilled to be able to meet demands of putting out, knowing the novel them, the characters and their deepest secrets, fears and desires, and having a plot plan, I think it’s essential that a writer feeling blocked examine the whole. I mean the whole novel, and more. I mean the whole writer.

First look at the novel. Do you love this book? Does it tap into your emotions? Make you want to laugh, cry, choke the living daylights out of something? Does it arouse your passion? If not, change it until it does. If you don’t, then apathy sets in, and you’re setting yourself up for more blocks. And for rejections. You can’t arouse empathy in anyone else if it isn’t put there by you, the writer. If you don’t feel it, how can you stir it in others? So get passionate. Write something that matters to you. If you can’t do that on this novel, then ditch the project. If your passion is aroused, you’ll have plenty to say—and tons of ways to say it. Passion arouses all the nebulous creative juices and they make the work flow.

As a writer, how do you feel about writing this particular book? Are you writing a category novel because you love them, or because you’ve heard that so many of them are published your odds of breaking into publishing are greater by writing one of them? Are you writing your novel because it’s the kind of story you love to read? The kind you’ve always done and changing is too hard, or intimidating?

Writer know thyself. Know why you’re doing this project. And if the reason is anything other than for the joy of it, because you love the story, do yourself a favor. Recognize the odds of it being your best work are shot before you pick up a pen. Why waste your time—this is your life, you know?—working on a project that doesn’t matter to you? Feigned interest and enthusiasm is glaringly apparent, and it’s as offensive as anything else that is hypocritical. You can’t fake it. You have to feel it.

WB is an unforgiving term. It can cause writers a lot of pain and agony. It can have numerous tentacles and each one of them can choke the writer. With each choke, fear and doubt that you’ll ever be able to write again gain strength. But you have the power to work past it. By analyzing each tentacle, writers often find that they’re not blocked at all. They love writing as much as they ever did. They’ve only burned out and not recharged their creative batteries, they’ve forgotten the value of passion, they’ve stepped off the trail and gotten mired in the brush.

Well, get a sickle. Hack through that brush and more often than not you’ll discover you’re truly not blocked, you’re suffering phantom pains. Ones that are rooted in exhaustion, splintered focus, too many demands. In structure, discipline, and definition—lost limbs.

The best news is that once you identify them, you can form a concrete plain of action to combat them, and these limbs can rejuvenate. It takes effort, a little indulgence in spending the time and energy to figure out the root causes of the problem. But when you have, you can rejoice because you’ve worked your way through writer’s block.*